Table of Contents
Summary
Acknowledgements
Prologue
Part One
Beginning with Difference: number, empiricism and the postcolonial
Problems of Number, Problems for Postcolonialism
Number Studies in the Social Sciences
Empiricism and Multiplicity: metaphysics for different differences
Number coming to life in Arnhem Land
Postcolonial Potentials in indigenous Australian Philosophy
Doing relational empiricism as performing a screening
Intensive Enumeration: a screening of the problem of value
The New Empirical: from Discipline Societies to Control Societies
Controlled Communities: Income Management and the Northern Territory Emergency Response
Income Management: folds in the Event of Enumerating Value
Number as relation: the intensive enumeration of money value
Economies of qualities: new businesses and products in the market of managed money
Intensive enumeration: the actualisation of potentials as prehensions
Beyond Value as Extension: number as event, value as its quality
Research as Screening: potential difference and composition
Going on … feeling our way into difference as potential
Part Two
From Helpful to Hopeful: becoming an observant participant within comparative research
An Active Comparison of Comparisons
Presentation: looking at the difference over there
Decomposition: situating the outside third of comparison
Participation: ethnographer-in-the-text as expression of comparison
Hopeful Expressions of Participant Comparison
Toward Maths as a Cultural Practice
Mathematics as Participant Comparison: value as extensive, value as intensive
Footsteps and Formula: foundations for a mathematics
Some Metaphors for Working a Remote Mathematics
Knowing Number: Internal Properties and External Relations
Ethnographic Numbers: a Western achievement of Intensive Number
Ethnographic Numbers: a Yolŋu Achievement of Extensive Number
What is the Value of Money?
Going on … into the wild
Part Three
Numbers in the Wild: listening for number and amplifying its capacities
Re-introducing Oscillating Value as Eternal Object
A Valuation in the Classroom: (extensive)Value/order
A Valuation in the Long Jump: Symbol/Index/Icon
A Valuation in Card Games: Cardinality/Ordinality
A Valuation in Accounts: Symbol/Index/Icon
A Valuation in Working with Cars: Symbol/Index/Icon
Conclusion: The Potential of Number
Number’s Role in the Progressive Composition of the World
Novelty and Responsibility in Relational Empiricism
A Hopeful Potential for Number
References
Numbers in Arnhem Land: Difference and value in a post-colonial mathematics – Table of Contents
Numbers in Arnhem Land: Difference and Value in a Post-colonial Mathematic – Summary
Summary
In conventional accounts of mathematics and number there is nothing new to learn: difference and value always arrive internal to the accounts. Is there potential for alternative forms of mathematics, the potential for number to do more than name value? How might we learn to work with numbers that perform multiple valuations and how might we learn from number in situations that are constituted through difference? Can difference become more than what is left in the aftermath of ‘our’ values, and become a positive potential for learning new ways to value? These questions can only be understood and addressed through an empirical and philosophical re-conceptualisation of number, value and difference in situations constituted by difference.
Numbers in Arnhem Land investigates the role of number and the ways in which it promotes a quality of oscillating value. Through an empirical investigation, number is understood as an event, an active and embodied relation or comparison done through and as difference. Numbers as event differenciate specific relations in collective life. Learning how number does value demands learning how number can articulate itself as relations that are multiple and open. The notion of oscillating value has value not as an abstract property of number, but a virtual quality. Valuations are the limits number approaches within the event. Understanding value as limits in this way allows numbers to play a full role in constituting collective life.
Learning the potential of number through value demands an understanding of empiricism and ethnography that is also committed to difference as primary and irreducible in the encounter. Relational empiricism, as developed through this thesis, is not the measuring and valuing of worlds already ordered and valued (the forms of empiricism offered by both universal and relativist critiques), but the work of resonating differences, becoming sensitive to more tones, the audible and inaudible, through which new forms of collecting living and harmony may grow. Relational empiricism is an empiricism which is thoroughly experimental.
Numbers in Arnhem Land is a post-colonial encounter. The analysis is located in between the Yolŋu ways of living in North East Arnhem Land and the dominant modes of living in Australia. It operates in between European thought and Yolŋu thought and in between the intellectual traditions of the academy and those of Aboriginal Australia. The problem for which this thesis works solutions is a problem of the postcolonial situation in contemporary Australia. Through engaging in an encounter through living ‘in between’, this project is itself performing and enacting relations. These relations are comparisons, the active holding together of difference in ways that sustain learning and participate in collective life in ways that are open and hopeful.
In articulating number through difference, and feeling for ways into the resonances through which number operates as difference and through oscillating value, this thesis demonstrates a mode of learning value through a respect for difference. This thesis claims that caring for difference in such a way opens the way for a renewed and revived study of number and empiricism in the social sciences.
Problems of Ethnography, Problems of Encounter: using a Deleuzian framing in ethnographic based research
Here’s a link to a recent panel in which I participated entitled “Beyond Method: stories of generative concepts, the new empiricism and messy research”.
It was part of the Australian Association for the History and Philosophy of Science Conference at the University of Sydney in July 2010.
My contribution is an extension of the ideas about ethnography and events I began in the post Deleuzian Ethnography.
Stengers, Whitehead and the second empiricism
This is a summary of what is a ‘second empiricism’ written about by Latour in ‘What Is Given in Experience?’ (2005) boundary 2, 32(1), 223-237. Latour’s piece is a review of Isabelle Stengers’s Penser avec Whitehead: Une libre et sauvage création de concepts translated as Thinking with Whitehead: the free and wild invention of concepts)
‘The basic question is to decide whether or not empiricism can be renewed so that ‘‘what is given in experience’’ is not simplified too much.’ (p 226)
Continue reading →
